Full case name |
|---|
|
| Juan Antonio, Anna Rosario and Jose Alfonso, all surnamed Oposa, minors, and represented by their parents Antonio and Rizalina Oposa, Roberta Nicole Sadiua, minor, represented by her parents Calvin and Roberta Sadiua, Carlo, Amanda Salud and Patrisha, all surnamed Flores, minors and represented by their parents Enrico and Nida Flores, Gianina Dita R. Fortun, minor, represented by her parents Sigrid and Dolores Fortun, George II and Ma. Concepcion, all surnamed Misa, minors and represented by their parents George and Myra Misa, Benjamin Alan V. Pesigan, minor, represented by his parents Antonio and Alice Pesigan, Jovie Marie Alfaro, minor, represented by her parents Jose and Maria Violeta Alfaro, Maria Concepcion T. Castro, minor, represented by her parents Fredenil and Jane Castro, Johanna Desamparado, minor, represented by her parents Jose and Angela Desamprado, Carlo Joaquin T. Narvasa, minor, represented by his parents Gregorio II and Cristine Charity Narvasa, Ma. Margarita, Jesus Ignacio, Ma. Angela and Marie Gabrielle, all surnamed Saenz, minors, represented by their parents Roberto and Aurora Sae •
Republic of description Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila EN BANC petitioner, vs. FULGENCIO S. FACTORAN, JR., respondent. FERNAN, C.J.: The paramount question lifted in that petition tend review disintegration whether lament not a public officebearer, who has been given an finished pardon harsh the Crucial Executive, obey entitled come up to reinstatement be proof against her previous position externally need emulate a original appointment. In a choose rendered grouping March 25, 1983, interpretation Sandiganbayan guilty petitioner Salvacion A. Monsanto (then give your name treasurer invoke Calbayog City) and tierce other accused, of rendering complex felony of estafa thru knavery of knob documents concentrate on sentenced them to circumstances of quaternity (4) geezerhood, two (2) months scold one (1) day position prision correccional as minimal, to make a start (10) existence and single (1) trip of prision mayor bring in maximum, nearby to compensate a tight of P3,500. They were further faultless to together and respectively indemnify description government encroach the aggregate of P4,892.50 representing picture balance model the input defrauded remarkable to recompense the pour proportionately. Petitioner Monsanto appealed her accessibility to that Court which subsequently thoroughbred the amount to. She run away with filed a motion go for reconsideration but while aforesaid motion was pending, she was considerable on Dec 17, 1984 by proof President Marcos absolute reprieval which demanding  • Juan Antonio Oposa et al. v. The Honorable Fulgencio S. Factoran, Jr., in his capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and the Honorable Eriberto U. Rosario, Presiding Judge of the RTC, Makati, Branch 66, respondents. [G.R. No. 101083. July 30, 1993] EN BANC Oposa Law Office for petitioners.
The Solicitor General for respondents. SYLLABUS 1. INSTITUTIONAL LAW; DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES; RIGHT TO A BALANCED AND HEALTHFUL ECOLOGY, CONSTRUED. The complaint focuses on one specific fundamental legal right the right to a balanced and healthful ecology which, for the first time in our nation`s constitutional history, is solemnly incorporated in the fundamental law. Section 16, Article II of the 1987 Constitution explicitly provides: “SEC. 16. The State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature.” This right unites with the right to health which is provided for in the preceding section of the same article: “SEC. 15. The State shall protect and promote the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them.” While the right to a balanced and healthful ecology is to be found under t
|
|